Interrogation techniques are the methods used by an adversary to obtain information from people during interrogations.
Interrogation techniques can include lying, making threats, instilling guilt, shame, or pride, trying to appear friendly and helpful or, on the contrary, threatening and violent, etc. In some cases, they can include physical violence.
See How the police interrogate and how to defend against it (in French and German) for a comprehensive overview of police interrogation techniques.
Used in tactics: Incrimination
Mitigations
Name | Description |
---|---|
Avoiding self-incrimination | You should not talk to an adversary under any circumstances: this is the best way to resist their interrogation techniques. |
Used in repressive operations
Name | Description |
---|---|
Case against Boris | When interrogating people close to Boris, investigators used elaborate lies to try to get information from them[1]. For example, the investigators vaguely suspected that the people being interrogated had hosted Boris in April 2020 and wanted to confirm their suspicion, so they asked, “Our investigation revealed that you let [Boris] stay with you in April 2020. How long did he stay with you?” |
December 8 case | When interrogating defendants during custody, investigators[2]:
|
Warsaw 3 | A few weeks into his detention, one person gave an “extensive” testimony to the police. He claimed this was partly because of two techniques used by one of his lawyers to push him to give this testimony[3]:
|