Case against Direct Action

1982 - 1986
Contents

In 1983, five people were arrested and accused of being part of a group called Direct Action, which had carried out several actions in Canada in 1982, including the bombing of an electrical substation and the bombing of a factory belonging to the American defense contractor Litton Industries[1]. In the weeks prior to their arrest, they were planning to rob a guard of the cash handling company Brink's.

The main evidence in the case came from conversations recorded by microphones hidden in the group members' homes.

After several trials from 1983 to 1986[2], the five people were sentenced to prison, with sentences ranging from ten years to life imprisonment. By 1990, all of them had been released on parole.

Techniques used

NameDescription
Covert house visit

After overhearing (presumably during a physical surveillance operation) that four members of Direct Action who lived together in a house were leaving the house for two days to go camping, investigators conducted two covert visits of the house over those two days[1]:

  • On the first day, they visited the house to find a good place to install hidden microphones the next day and to check for possible booby traps.
  • On the second day, they visited the house to install hidden microphones and take photographs of suspicious items and documents.
Covert surveillance devices
Audio

Investigators installed hidden microphones[1]:

  • In the house where four members of Direct Action lived.
  • In the apartment where the fifth member of Direct Action lived.

One day, after overhearing (presumably during a physical surveillance operation) that a member of Direct Action and his girlfriend were planning to have lunch at a cafe later in the day, investigators, with the cooperation of the cafe owner, quickly took the following steps:

  • They installed a hidden microphone in a rubber plant inside the cafe.
  • They replaced a waiter with a surveillance operator who made sure that the member of Direct Action and his girlfriend sat at a table near the plant.
Forensics
Linguistics

Investigators noticed linguistic similarities between action claims published by Direct Action and articles in a local quarterly publication called Resistance[1]. This led them to identify a contributor to Resistance, who was a friend of members of Direct Action, and place her under physical surveillance.

House raid

In a raid on the house where four members of Direct Action lived, investigators found[2]:

  • Related to the electrical substation bombing: plans of the action site, a copy of the action claim sent after the bombing, and newspaper clippings of articles about the bombing.
  • Related to the Litton Industries bombing: photographs and plans of the action site, newspaper clippings of articles about the bombing, and a pocket knife taken by a member of Direct Action from the stolen van used in the bombing.
Mass surveillance
Civilian snitches

Several civilians helped investigators[1]. In particular:

  • Journalists told investigators that they had noticed similarities between action claims published by Direct Action and articles in a local quarterly publication called Resistance.
  • A hunter, presumably by chance, discovered two wooden structures where members of Direct Action stored the stolen explosives they used in bombings, and alerted the police to the discovery[2].
  • The landlords of the house where four members of Direct Action lived gave investigators the key to the house so they could enter and install hidden microphones.
Physical surveillance
Aerial

After investigators discovered the remote area where members of Direct Action hid the stolen explosives they used in bombings, they arranged for a helicopter to fly over the area daily for surveillance purposes[1].

Covert

For several weeks, investigators followed members of Direct Action and some of their friends as they moved on foot and in vehicles[1].

On at least one occasion, investigators witnessed a member of Direct Action conducting anti-surveillance maneuvers, which they found suspicious.